例句與造句

1. Q . I use a Macintosh and Microsoft Word 98 as my writing tools of choice, and I hate having to press multiple keys to get the proper quotation marks.
2. :ISTM that your difficulty is due to your misquoting the phrase, the proper quotation is " The pursuit of happiness " . talk ) 20 : 30, 30 October 2011 ( UTC)
3. A . Turning on Word's AutoCorrect feature ( found under the Tools menu ) will automatically put in the proper quotation marks when you press the apostrophe key, or the shift of that key.
4. I have several publications in various medical journals and know the proper form of quotation, if you cannot follow proper quotation rules then I question your ability to be an author on this document at all.
5. I might have at one time included verbatim text from websites, even with a proper quotations, but since reading wikipedia policies more carefully, I have removed that text and replaced it with original writing, not original research.
6. It's difficult to find proper quotations in a sentence. 用proper quotations造句挺難的
7. [http : / / en . wikipedia . org / wiki / Wikipedia : Vandalism # Types _ of _ vandalism " sneaky vandalism "-deleting proper quotation from published consensus policy statement on immunization by organisation, representing 630 Waldorf schools in Europe, and the proper citation for it, balancing section on immunization and contributing to improving the article . "'Thebee 00 : 12, 27 February 2007 ( UTC ) "'
8. Attempting to discuss the issue with him, and at the subsequent request for a WP : CCI ( I received only resistance and denial ( [ http : / / en . wikipedia . org / w / index . php ? title = Talk : European _ Stability _ Mechanism & diff = 519249739 & oldid = 519235753 " I never copied word-for-word text into articles " . . . " only half of the sentence was accidently an identical copy " " I forgot to use some proper quotation marks for it " . . . " it is a very factual line almost impossible to rephrase with other words " " impossible to formulate otherwise, due to being listed as short factual bullet points; and not being formulated as a sentence / line " " nobody can claim a copyright violation for me to add an identical topical list to wikipedia ( with the topical words identical compared to what is reported by the article ), because its just not possible to change the formulation of the topical list without changing the meaning of the topical words . " . . . " you can not claim a copyright violation to an identically formulated " common standard technical description " " ) which were far from convincing that the user actually understood the issue being raised and would be able to avoid repeating it in the future.